G20 (2018-현재) · 320d
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 9. 30. 작업
Love it, both interior and exterior! Looking forward to the i3 and ICE/EV M3s. Huge improvement from the beaver grill imho, although I don't think I've ever really disliked any 3 series. Really liked the iX3 I drove, and most of my criticisms would be covered by the incoming i3 touring variant which we'll probably get as a daily. I'm so glad it seems BMW have turned a corner from the hideous recent designs of the 5/7/XM/whatever else.
je777 said: SDK said: kars said: SDK said: You're looking at the ICE 3 Series - that's history tbh !Progress is the i3 Cheaper, better looking, quicker, cleaner, more tech, more efficient, very likely better to drive (as a daily)New i3 is massive, much taller, wider, longer, 500kg heavier, i3 eDrive35L creates ~9% more total aerodynamic drag compared to G20 320i.How is this progress? Where is the efficiency? Driving around in a 2T+ kg is not efficient in anyway...Where is the efficiency? - it's an EV !EV's are much more energy efficient, than ICE cars. EV's use around 60% less energy to travel the same distance as an ICE car.An EV averaging 4 mi/kWh is the equivalent of an ICE car averaging 140 MPG, with the EV running on majority renewable generated electricity. Also, comparing a Long Wheel base i3 35 to a standard 320i - seriously ! Edited by SDK on Wednesday 30th September 11:47 There is no thread that SDK cannot make about EVs.Just answering the question about 'Where is the efficiency' People have the whole internet at their finger tips, they could easily find the answer themselves!..but no Apologies if I triggered your inner Anti-EV'ness, by highlighting the benefits Edited by SDK on Wednesday 30th September 13:30
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Reviews of the M350 are starting to hit the websites of the big magazines - all pretty positive. Looking like if you're sticking with combustion it's another really good 3 Series.
Kudos to the original owner.
mcpoot said: Another new car getting slammed by PH, that most conservative of audiences.If you lot had been around when the original mini was launched you'd have ripped it to shreds. Transverse engine, front wheel drive, rubber cone suspension? We want our inline, rear drive, leaf sprung that we're used to.It's just gopping. It's taken the ugly bits from the current one (particularly the F&R lights) and made them even worse. Shame, as everything up to and including the F30 looked great. Even the Bangle ones were decent-looking.If you want a good-looking Bimmer the last one is the G30 5 Se
Kudos to the original owner.
BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.