엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

BMW M4 수리 사례

G82 (2021-현재) · M4 Competition 자동

2026. 8. 22. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

I've always enjoyed the photography in EVO, and the general quality of the articles, but it's always had a slight tone of self importance that I find slightly irritating.Modern Classics has recaptured my interest in printed magazines after years of abstinence. Attainable cars, and clearly written by enthusiasts for enthusiasts.

처리 내용

vacant-100 said: I think what's turned me off EVO is the similarities between the cars and how they're described. A BMW M4 will lap a track competently within a second or two of a Merc C63 or Audi RS4. A 440 will do the same a few seconds slower than that, much like the Merc C43 or Audi S4. They've all got more or less the same equipment in them, and are so far out of my price range, I find them irrelevant. Likewise the Ferrari 488/Lamborghini Huracan/McLaren 720 - all highly competent and more or less the same.Then you get the odd article gushing over an 80s or 90s hot hatch, but nothing too critical, nothing comparing it one of it's peers. I guess Modern Classics suffers from that too, or they'll compare 2/3 crap cars but only be interested in the investment value of them. The recent Fiat Croma/Alfa 164/Lancia Thema triple test was proof of that, all fairly awful cars, but interesting to read about, although you'd be mad to spend more than a grand on any of them.The thing is though, Evo is a magazine for driving enthusiasts, and in terms of driving, the M4, C63 and S4 couldn't be more different. Sure, the prices, purpose and equipment levels may be the same, but that's the preserve of What Car and the concern of rich people who care not about cars and just want 'premium' transport for £50k. In terms of Evo, and in my terms too, they all have different engineering (particularly the S4), and as such drive differently. That's what Evo comment on and what distinguishes them from other magazines.Edited by RobM77 on Tuesday 31st October 12:21