엔진오일 교환 수리 사례

2026. 8. 23. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

apotek said: So do you think its fair to in effect carve up cars when there has been warning of lane reduction and closuresZip merging is the correct way to do things, Why are you complaining because you do not follow the HC? It is not 'carving up' it is merely following the rules.My whinge is about whingers who complain about people following the rules.

처리 내용

Mandat said: Graveworm said: Except in the same part of the Highway code that says merge in turn should be considered in slow moving congested traffic. It precedes it with, don't change lanes unnecessarily. It's having your cake and eating it to change lanes and then to merge in turn. Don't change lanes unnecessarily = Do change lanes necessarily. If it is necessary to change lanes to avoid an obstruction ahead, then it is necessary.This is the same concept as the often misunderstood rule 130, about entering areas of diagonal stripes / chevrons to overtake, with many people wrongly thinking that the overtake needs to be necessary, instead of just the act of entering the chevrons being necessary.Not the same parsing at all - why is it necessary to change lane. If it is obstructed then yes but the only obstruction is the closing lane. Why would there need to be any different language for congested conditions. It also explicitly says "Stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues." Edited by Graveworm on Sunday 23 August 13:38