X760 (2015-현재) · 2.0T AWD 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 14. 작업
maybe they aren't?just a thought....
Sway said: SpeckledJim said: Sway said: A Ghost is far more practical at the rear, and that's the middle ground between the Phantom (the limo option) and the Wraith (which is more comparable to this in terms of overall practicality, and is two door). Then, as per Jag wanting to make a "splash" with their first EV, RR chose to do the Spectre (again, similar rear practicality) as a two door. So there clearly is a cache. Ghost is more practical, granted. And as such the shape is a lot less exciting and a lot more conventional. Everything is a trade-off. If Type01 had the Ghost's silhouette and rear cabin space then we wouldn't be here talking about it with such energy. Why's it a big deal that they've chosen to make a dramatically styled and somewhat compromised saloon, instead of a dramatically styled and even more compromised coupe? Both come with upsides and downsides.I've mentioned before, but recognise it could well be my failing in ability - it's that the whole thing is singularly uncompromising for the exterior design, except for that one bit of adding extra doors. I just don't 'get it' - either truly go all in, or don't! What I would say is have a look at the interior of Spectre. The door aperture starts about 2" in front of the front edge of the rear seat base. So you fall backward into that seat and need to be fairly limber to get back out again.The door aperture on Type01 is positioned about halfway or 2/5s back on the rear seat base. Much easier to access, relatively-speaking.That's a design decision, made with the ultimate purposes of the vehicle in mind. There's no one right answer.If you have a fit and sexy gran then maybe Spectre is sufficiently practical to get her to Claridges for lunch. Happy days.But if your gran is moderately fat then maybe Spectre won't work and you need a Type01 instead. That said, if gran is bloody huge then maybe Type01 is also no good and you need a boring Ghost. Or a Peugeot Traveller?
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Nice to note the original 120's feature of contra-rotating needles for tacho and speedo has been retained.
Fun fact: The Series 2 Citroen CX wing mirrors were used by some sports and supercar royalty back in the day: Jaguar XJ220, McLaren F1 prototypes and various Aston Martins, Lotus and TVRs. Not a bad claim to fame.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.