변속기 오일 교환 수리 사례

2026. 10. 25. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

monkfish1 said: The move away from diesel and petrol cars cannot be faster than the time it takes the vehicle fleet to renew. Which is, i believe at the moment, 14 years. Ie, average life of a vehicle.True, but the rate can shift. Higher average reliability might slow it. Higher petrol/diesel costs might accelerate it.

처리 내용

DonkeyApple said: Cristio Nasser said: DonkeyApple said: Tigger2050 said: DonkeyApple said: It'll soon all kick off over Rosebank where we know that we U.K. taxpayers will be paying Equinor £3bn to reach point of production and then if oil drops below $70/barrel it will be an ongoing loss to UK taxpayers. No one is rushing to explain that we, the taxpayer will lose money and have to pay out of global oil trades below $70/barrel. And we know that oil will go back below $70 after the U.S. stops blockading the straits of Hormuz. One can only assume that the people in Britain who want Rosebank to proceed are either non taxpayers who want U.K. taxpayers to be fked or are in the employ of external parties wanting to weaken the U.K. economically. The third option is that they are stupid old men who have spent their life not learning anything but devoutly believe they know everything but that seems very unlikely as this would imply the U.K. has a legion of complete fktards and that they've been allowed to vote for years. No we are not paying Equinor 3 billion to develop Rosebank. Just like we do not pay housebuilders billions to construct houses, or Tesco and Sainsburys et al to build more stores, or to any other company which invests in infrastructure to increase production, increase employment and produce more tax down the line. Investment in these things exempts that money from tax, just as it should do, or companies would never invest in this country. A ludicrous argument employed by Green warriors everywhere.Also, why do Iran, Saudi, Russia, Venezuela etc pay so little for their fuel? Oh that's right, being sovereign countries they decide what goes on in these matters in their country, with resources sourced there, just as we could if we had the political will. Yes we are. We pay 84% of the production costs to bring Rosebank on stream. After that, the oil needs to be sold for >$70/barrel or U.K. taxpayers pay out again. And the reason the U.K. doesn't do wh