X760 (2015-현재) · 2.0T AWD 자동
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 11. 작업
GT9 said: Define 'car design'?Using first engineering principles to design a car to be the most efficient in terms of aerodynamics and powertrain efficiency pretty much leads us to exactly what you are looking at.Length is essentially free in aerodynamic terms and when combined with lower frontal area offers high volume with low drag, aka, an aircraft fuselage.The car's mass is a byproduct of the need for the highest possible powertrain efficiency and is just one of those engineering compromises we have to accept.Maybe if you were look for beauty in engineering excellence and not just visual
J4CKO said: OLDBENZ said: cidered77 said: Sway said: The idea it's too big for the UK, when every single day pretty much every road in the country is traversed by a 3.5t Amazon/DPD van with a driver who's on minimum wage and has had no additional training...It's odd. I can understand wanting narrowness as a method of enabling more fun road driving on b roads and the like, but for a luxo barge? If every single vehicle in the UK were a 3.5t amazon delivery van, do you think we'd have more issues on B roads in and in normal commuting-spec public carparks, or less? Been said on this thread loads (mostly by me, granted), but - 2 meters wide is a pain day to day. I accept modern car things like having to switch bings and bongs off, having to look down at a screen or use voice for certain things, not being able to change my own brake pads without a PHD in mechnical and software engineering, and a new wing mirror costing £17k... but i refuse to accept having to plan ahead where and how I park my daily driver so i avoid having to contort myself out of it. All it takes is another 2 meter car next to you, and you're ****ed. Google tells me standard space in UK is 2.4m wide. Park a Polestar 4 next to an Electre next to a FFRR (not uncommon in my local station carpark), and they have less than 400mm to get out *if* everyone parks straight, which they don't. That is tiny. I'd get one of these, i love it. I'd use as a daily. But parking it at the station every day genuinely stops me considering. If I am correct, the side panels of the Jaguar 01 are made from aluminium which is, of course, very soft and susceptible to door dings to a degree that steel panels and composites etc are not. Given its width, any 01 on carpark duty in Europe will inevitably soon end up with pockmarked flanks which will give any enthusiast owner serious tooth itch. I wish Jaguar well but think they would do well to produce something narrower for the European market.You are not correct, aluminium i
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗Nice to note the original 120's feature of contra-rotating needles for tacho and speedo has been retained.
Fun fact: The Series 2 Citroen CX wing mirrors were used by some sports and supercar royalty back in the day: Jaguar XJ220, McLaren F1 prototypes and various Aston Martins, Lotus and TVRs. Not a bad claim to fame.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.