쇼크업소버 교환미국 · Stack Exchange★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

쇼크업소버 교환 수리 사례

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 7. 27. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 120~240🔧 리프트🔧 특수공구

증상

Lowering a vehicle affects many aspects related to suspension geometry and aerodynamics. I am trying to understand these phenomena better. Note that although my question sounds like an opinion, it's not really my intent. I just wanted to describe how I understand things so that people can point me to the flaws in my understanding and wrong assumptions. We read in many places on the internet that one of the main reasons for lowering a car is to reduce its center of gravity with respect to the ground, thereby reducing the body roll. This sounds like a myth to me, because as you lower your vehicl

처리 내용

I think the easiest way to realize your initial argument of why lower the center of gravity , can easily be shown as misguided by this one simple statement. If what you are suggesting is accurate, why not create race vehicles with the Center of Gravity (CG) 10 feet in the air? The simple reason is, your side to side stability would be gone. As you lower the CG, stability is improved. Something to realize is, the CG and Roll Center (RC), while having a relationship, are two different things. By changing one, you do not necessarily change the other. Two quotes found in the book, Tune to Win by Carroll Smith (pgs 29-30): Center of Gravity: THE CENTER OF GRAVITY of any body is defined as that point about which, if the body were suspended from it, all parts of the body would be in equilibrium - i.e. without tendency to rotate. It is the three dimensional balance point of the race car. All accelerative forces acting on a body can be considered to act through the center of gravity of that bod

출처

이 사례는 Stack Exchange (미국)에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 쇼크업소버 교환 사례

포르쉐

포르쉐 카이엔

M138 said: Clad-Hach said: For me everything about Maserati screams run a mile, why would anyone buy a car from a brand with a reliability record arguably worse than a JLR product.Yes some of them look good but if you're stuck on the hard shoulder that would be the last thing on your mind.If you take a similar vintage Porsche 996 compared to a Maserati 4200, the Maserati engine is bulletproof compared to the Porsche engine. Where Maserati falls short is something like a suspension part on a Maserati 4200 that is nla.The availability or price of parts on a Maserati can quite rightly receive c

미니

미니 쿠퍼

하부 볼 조인트가 녹슬고 손상되어 있으며, 여러 부품들이 부식된 상태. 분해 및 해체 작업 진행 중.

토요타

토요타 코롤라

Ste372 said: pocketspring said: The Celica had it's own engine line up, the 4AGE wasn't used in them. It was used in the Corolla GTi though.Yes I know it wasn't used in the Celica what I'm getting at is it would of upset the applecart. If it had a 4age in it. It would of been as quick, if not quicker than the Celica so why would anyone have spent double on buying a Celica every car has its place in a manufacturers line up. This was placed in the budget friendly coupe. Do you think putting the 1.6L 112bhp 4AGE engine in the Paseo would have made it quicker than the 2.0L 173bhp 3SGE engine mk6

BMW

BMW 5시리즈

mwstewart said: I'm going to treat it to a set of Bilstein B8 dampers and new OEM springs.I'm a bit surprised that Mr "American-spec non-sport" is planning to buy some B8 dampers:1. I can't recall whether you've fitted lowering springs to the Corsa (or if the ecoFLEX model is fitted with them as standard), but aren't B8s for cars with lowering springs, whereas B6s are for standard springs?2. When various BMW guys on here fit Eibach lowering springs to their cars, they tend to fit B4S dampers as they've found B8s to be too firm.