총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 28. 작업
Did Leno buy any of the GMA models?
Flemke (and other F1 owners past or present),can you talk about car insurance......Perhaps not the sexiest question ever asked on here but the resent talk of owners driving their cars, or more likely not driving them made me think. Now these cars have made it into the realm of 250GTO, 330P4, Bugatti Royale, Le Mans winning C/D types and alike the cars are now un scrapable. Case in point 061is the most well known but I think its also known of more than a few others having had considerable "events" ,"corrected" as the value of the car is greater then the repair value. To my understanding the only thing that could write off an F1 these days is damage so severe to the tub that a repair would be unsafe. I'm not saying the tub couldn't be "fixed up" to look ok but the repair would not be structurally sound as is the case with XJR14 791 which now is a display only car. Now that there are no more replacement tubs left (Yes McLaren made more tubs then chassis plates....but not that many more) significant tub damage should kill an F1 but nothing else could (happy to be corrected here if anyone knows of anything else, I'm not sure how many S70/2 are left).All that is to say...what's the risk of driving one? If the insurance cant scrap it and even crash history (to my knowledge at least 35 F1 have had some sort of crash) or high miles don't significantly effect the market, see 10R and your very own "oh sorry mate, with that many miles Im gonna have to offer you a lot less then you think its worth mate" 040. So if the car is unaffected by miles, was in a crash and the insurance cant write it off why are people not driving them? There could be personal reasons (no time, health etc) but the root of my question is as stated at the start, are there insurance clauses that stop owners? Will an insurance company agree to cover such an expensive "asset" only if "It never leaves home", "It only goes 20 miles, under the cover of night whilst protected by the SAS".Can you (and others) giv
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗차량 정보 없음
CNG 변환 시스템 부품 구성 및 비용 효율성 검토 필요 (MAZDA5 차량, 연비 25mpg, 주행거리 150,000km 예상, 손익분기점 $10,000)
지프 랭글러
99년식 지프 랭글러 2.5 엔진의 실린더 헤드 교체 필요성 검토 중. 이베이에서 구할 수 있는 신품 완성 헤드들이 있음. 애프터마켓 헤드 사용 경험이나 다른 대안에 대한 조언 필요. 가스켓 상태 확인 필요.
BMW 5시리즈
BMW 318 TDS 가솔유 연료펌프(프리펌프)가 밀폐된 연료탱크 내부에 장착되어 있고, 12V 전기가 공급되는 소형 모터를 포함하고 있습니다. 모터 내부에서 스파크가 발생할 수 있고, 연료탱크 내에 공기가 있으면 폭발할 위험이 있는데 어떻게 폭발 위험 없이 작동하는지 이해가 안 됨. (주유 시 휴대전화 사용을 금지하는 것과의 모순)
폭스바겐 골프
2011 유럽형 VW 골프 Mk6 Variant, 2.0 TDI 엔진 (CFHC 엔진 코드, Euro 5 배출가스 기준, DPF 장착, AdBlue 미장착, 4Motion 미장착)에 약 200,000km 주행. 지난 5년간 5W-30 엔진오일 사용해옴. 백야드 정비사가 높은 주행거리를 이유로 5W-40으로 변경할 것을 권장함. 변경해도 장기적으로 엔진에 부정적 영향이 없는지, 올바른 결정인지 확인 필요.