X760 (2015-νμ¬) Β· 2.0T AWD μλ
μ΄ λΉμ©
-
곡μ
-
λΆνλΉ
-
μμ μκ°
-
2026. 10. 4. μμ
I actually like the new font, less keen on the Logo, but the big let down is the pathetic attempt to woke up the brand with an advert featuring a bunch of very odd looking people with an inability to smile.........I honestly couldn't care less about peoples sexual orientation, how they want to be identified or indeed how they dress, but on what planet does a brand like Jaguar think this represents their products. It is literally has to be the flip opposite as to what I would consider 'Jaguar'.
jenkosrugby said: I actually like the new font, less keen on the Logo, but the big let down is the pathetic attempt to woke up the brand with an advert featuring a bunch of very odd looking people with an inability to smile.........I honestly couldn't care less about peoples sexual orientation, how they want to be identified or indeed how they dress, but on what planet does a brand like Jaguar think this represents their products.It is literally has to be the flip opposite as to what I would consider 'Jaguar'.I think that's the point. Jaguar have tried the "William Lyons' ideal car, with feline haunches and feminine hips, wood, leather, iron fist in a velvet glove, leaping cats and nods to Le Man."And they even tried that as a veneer over some very advanced engineering. It created a fiercely loyal and enthusiastic but far too small customer base. They tried "mass market while offering something different to the dour Germans. A tweed three-piece in a world of shiny off-the-peg business suits. Shamelessly retro while hewing close to the traditional brand values."Didn't work. Critically mixed reception when new, all massively underperformed their sales targets. Matured into better and better-liked products by the time they were canned but far too little, far too late. Then under Tata they tried "go toe-to-toe with the Germans by offering sleek, slick, modern executive cars which are shamelessly modern with a few stylistic nods to Jaguar design cues and building on our heritage of fine handling and sophisticated refinement to make a USP." That didn't work either, with Jaguar spending a fortune on a new platforms, models and drivetrains to sell only a fraction of their German benchmarks. So what's left? They tried traditional and exclusive. They tried traditional and mass market. They tried modern and mass market. I suppose they could try more directly "modern and exclusive" without explicitly ditching all their previous branding and values. This seems to have been wher
μΆμ²
μ΄ μ¬λ‘λ PistonHeadsμμ μμ§ν λ°μ΄ν°μ λλ€.
μ λ’°λ 4.1μ (λμ) β μΆμ² μμ€μ μ λ¬Έμ±/κ²μ¦κ΅¬μ‘°λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ μ°μ λ μ μμ΄λ©°, μ νμ±μ 보μ₯νμ§ μμ΅λλ€.
μλ¬Έ 보기 βNice to note the original 120's feature of contra-rotating needles for tacho and speedo has been retained.
Fun fact: The Series 2 Citroen CX wing mirrors were used by some sports and supercar royalty back in the day: Jaguar XJ220, McLaren F1 prototypes and various Aston Martins, Lotus and TVRs. Not a bad claim to fame.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
Gorgeous. I'd be very happy with this, although I think Eagle's reimagining of the E Type is a little more successful visually.
BMW 5μ리μ¦
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
ν¬λ₯΄μ μΉ΄μ΄μ
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
μ°¨λ μ 보 μμ
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
ν¬λ₯΄μ μΉ΄μ΄μ
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.