머플러 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

머플러 교환 수리 사례

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 9. 5. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~120🔧 리프트🔧 특수공구

증상

A bit of scaremongering with that headline. This is overwhelmingly targeting the “delete/tamper/defeat” end of the tuning market i.e. DPF delete, GPF delete, AdBlue delete, EGR delete, Cat delete, emissions-off remaps etc etc. Not a blanket ban on modifying cars with performance enhancing mods. In fact, the DfT explicitly says it is not seeking to prohibit all vehicle modifications and is not trying to stop owners/businesses fitting non-OEM parts, either. So its a non-issue for most of us on here.And even if this were to pass, the DVSA won't suddenly have the resources to thoroughly inspect/te

처리 내용

Terminator X said: FourRingedDonuts said: Oiyou said: In reality is this any different to failing an MOT for having a decat pipe? Unusually, I have a decat pipe so was bricking it at the first MOT, expecting a fail.It passed with lower emissions figures than when It had the factory exhaust on. That's been the case for 15 years now and no MOT tester has ever failed it on emissions, or questioned where my cat is. I can only assume, as it looks like a sports cat, and passes emissions they think job done.It would fail the proposed new test though I guess as it would need to be as it left the factory?TX. It seems that for Euro V and VI cars there will be tighter emissions standards, more closely aligned to the OEM's published figures, but, as others have said, MOT test centres don't have the specialist equipment to do this. The proposals seem to focus on cars with faulty or missing emissions control systems, the ones that can be seen (catalysts, particulate filters, SCR/AdBlue, EGR etc.). It appears that remaps are OK as long as they still pass on emissions, but this really is just speculation at this stage.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 머플러 교환 사례