์ด ๋น์ฉ
-
๊ณต์
-
๋ถํ๋น
-
์์ ์๊ฐ
-
2026. 9. 25. ์์
I'm thinking more something that takes up part of the bootspace until you unplug it and haul it out!Not going to happen, of course, our weird tax quirk that EVs with the capability to burn fossil fuels will get taxed less than pure ones is I believe unique to the UK.
DonkeyApple said: 127Sport said: Interesting development recently on the "not having a drive" blocker. Government legislation to remove the requirement for planning permission to install a pavement gully for a charging cable is going to be passed in the next few weeks. You'll still need approval from your local council highways authority, but it's one less impediment. Hopefully LAs will start to realize they need to approve these sort of installations for people, and some good ones already are. Others need to catch up.Yes, I know, it still won't guarantee the parking spot outside your house for you exclusively, but many people only need to charge once a week or so and a lot of urban dwellers in terraces walk and use public transport more than those of us in the suburbs with driveways. So keep an eye out of the front window when you're passing and move your car in when the space is free. It's a distinct improvement on having no charging access at all, and maybe we will get to the stage where we can request dedicated bays outside houses, as is possible for disabled drivers presently.You've spotted the issue. They don't own the parking space outside their property. They have absolutely no rights to that space. More than a few people already fail to understand this and create regular altercations with strangers or neighbours who have the right to park there. And it's not exactly uncommon to see the evidence of one of those cone or wheelie in knobheads. Making a resident pay to dig up a bit of pavement they don't own so that a car could be charged on a bit of street they don't own is just going to achieve nothing more than hours of entertaining YT footage as cretins swing sticks at people in enraged confusion. And then, as you allude to, the solution will be to mark out and rent out these spaces. And then, people who used to be able to park for free close to their home will no longer be able to. There will be fewer spaces due to the markings and those s
์ถ์ฒ
์ด ์ฌ๋ก๋ PistonHeads์์ ์์งํ ๋ฐ์ดํฐ์ ๋๋ค.
์ ๋ขฐ๋ 4.1์ (๋์) โ ์ถ์ฒ ์์ค์ ์ ๋ฌธ์ฑ/๊ฒ์ฆ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ์ฐ์ ๋ ์ ์์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ ํ์ฑ์ ๋ณด์ฅํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค.
์๋ฌธ ๋ณด๊ธฐ โBMW 5์๋ฆฌ์ฆ
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
ํฌ๋ฅด์ ์นด์ด์
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
์ฐจ๋ ์ ๋ณด ์์
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
ํฌ๋ฅด์ ์นด์ด์
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.