포르쉐
정기점검PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

포르쉐 카이엔 수리 사례

2006년식 · 9PA (2002-2010) · 3.2

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 9. 15. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 쉬움⏱ 예상 60~120분🔧 전용 진단기

증상

Excellent.Was the Yellow CGT that used to be in the back of the mag yours? Talking back to around 2006 maybe....

처리 내용

Cheib said: SSO said: Cheib said: You’ve clearly got a hugely varied “back catalogue” but McLaren seem to be your current preferred manufacturer ? On the face of it there seems a fair amount of duplication with running three Spider’s ? Although in the 675 LT that’s clearly a very special car. What are the qualities you really like about McLaren’s and do you track the Senna ? Edited by Cheib on Monday 18th January 22:18 I haven't tracked the Senna yet but that's not really the cars fault. We moved across the country shortly after I took delivery. It then went into storage for a few months while the move got sorted, then came winter followed by Covid. Hopefully things normalize in a few months and I can get it out on a track. 675LT Spider is a phenomenal car. Personally think it's the best car McLaren has built to date. 720S Spider is again very different. Hugely capable yet quite civilized. 650S Spider has been my DD for over 5 years, yes the 720S Spider does everything a bit better but I have a soft spot for the 650S as its been a really good car. In terms of McLaren being my current preferred supplier. A lot of it has to do with my recent experiences with Ferrari (covered it in a blog) and the fact that I prefer cars built off of CF tubs.Interesting point about the CF tub...I remember when the 12c came out how that car was being raved about because of that. Makes a Spider compelling I would think.For those that haven’t read SSO’s blog it’s here https://karenable.com/super-cars/Very good it is too ! IMHO, the CF tub does make a noticeable difference. On the McLaren's you lose nothing going from a coupe to a spider, where on the aluminum Ferraris there is a noticeable difference.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

포르쉐 카이엔 다른 정비 사례

엔진오일 교환3.0 V6

A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.

엔진오일 교환3.0 V6

A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.

엔진오일 교환3.0 V6

If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.

정기점검3.0 V6

Writing the title made me wonder how many rear engined coupes have existed. I got 911 (obviously), some Alpines, Delorean, Fiat / Abarth versions of the 850. There must be more.But this is none of those. Its Japanese, made in the '80s and sold here in reasonable numbers. But they are now firmly in the category of 'rare but nobody gives a st'. And only a handful remain. It's a car I've had a yearning to own and got outbid on one at auction many years ago. More recently I contacted a seller on FB, we agreed a price and then he blocked me...So I broke the first rule of car buying and bought one s

다른 차종의 정기점검 사례