총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 20. 작업
Does this mean we are also going to get the V23 too? That’s another good looking thing.
Ray_Aber said: The Driving God said: Ray_Aber said: Not my thing at all, but for what it is, it's done well. However, if it's heavy, then please tax it accordingly, dear Chancellor. Just like HGVs, who damage the road a lot, and pay proportionately for it. That s a great point, especially since a standard HGV (class 1) only pays £1 a year, not a typo, just a single pound and only £161 for those up to 31 tonnes.Right now, EVs registered after 31/3/2017 pay £200 a year. If the Chancellor actually listened to you, EV drivers would be paying less than 10p a year in tax.Well, if you are right, then I stand corrected. However, I understood that HGVs - as a group of vehicles - also pay an additional HGV road user levy on top of the standard HGV charges which you have not factored in. According to the Freight Transport Association, HGVs pay £4.4bn in tax annually, with the annual road maintenance bill being £4.7bn. Now I'm sure that the FTA are being selective with their numbers (they include fuel duty for example), but my point stands. Heavy vehicles should pay additional taxes for the additional road damage they cause, not to mention the environmental cost of construction (additional materials). That's only fair, and would incentivise manufacturers to build lighter vehicles, and disincentivise individuals from buying overweight vehicles whose impact on the environment is disproportionately destructive. France does this with its Malus tax, which hammers heavy vehicles, although unfortunately this does not currently apply to EVs (whose heavier weight should be allowed for, but only in part - say, 350kg - 400kg). Of course, we'll never see that take place as it would destroy JLR and many of the c.35,000 jobs that rely on their success. If the Chancellor listened to me, EVs would be paying rather more than 10p a year in tax, especially heavy ones, but you knew that, didn't you? I don't like overweight cars. Your view may differ. Governments habe pushed us to Diesel then t
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.