총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 23. 작업
PCaluta said: Meanwhile, in China...What website did you use to find those vehicles
coates848 said: ITP said: I m not missing the point. The point is a personal car, not used for the majority of the time on company buisness, should not be allowed on salary sacrifice.What other personal luxuries should be tax deductible? Your family holiday? A boat? Why not put everything through and reduce your taxable income to zero? The company will also save 15% employers NI on the reduced taxable salary. Result! There will be lots of consumption of expensive goods but the exchequer will be a bit short.Yes you are missing the point. You're confusing business expenses with taxable renumeration. A company car does not have to be used predominantly for business purposes. It never has. The entire purpose of the Benefit in Kind regime is to tax the employee on the private use of a vehicle provided by their employer. That expressly includes commuting.Salary sacrifice simply means an employee agrees to receive less gross salary in exchange for a benefit. They still pay tax on the resulting Benefit in Kind. The employer may save Class 1 National Insurance on the salary sacrificed, but also has to pay Class 1A National Insurance on the taxable car benefit.What's wrong with someone saying they'd prefer a car lease payment from their employer instead of the equivalent salary payment? The benefit is still taxed under the BIK rules. Your boat and holiday examples are equally incorrect. Putting personal expenditure through a company doesn't magically make it tax free. Quite why you think a receptionist should be treated differently from a company director should they choose to receive part of their remuneration in the form of a car and pay the appropriate tax on it, is a bizarre hill to die on. The hill I’m dying on is the govt effectively subsidising people’s personal cars. Also, it’s not available to everyone. (By the way, I could use it as I’m a powerfully built company director.)Everybody knows people only use salary sacrifice to save lots of money over buying private
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.