총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 24. 작업
andy43 said: chirurgus said: My choice would be a face-lifted F Pace SVR. They drive like a ferociously fast saloon car and sound like thunder. I m with you on that. Cayenne and Macan are nice to drive (not as good as a Panamera ST though) but the F Pace engine just overshadows everything else.Agreed. The F-Pace is everything the RRS is while being smaller, hundreds of kilos lighter and without the stereotype issues.
WH16 said: Orangutangerine said: WH16 said: brillomaster said: Strong nope to all of these, completely unnecessary on today's roads. Furthermore, id be fine with anyone who does drive one of these gassing guzzling behemoths having to pay £5000 a year, every year, for the privilege. There is something about SUVs which always brings out the green eyed monster. It is strange as my OH's car (not an SUV) is almost exactly the same footprint as my FFRR, and weighs more, and is less fuel efficient, but nobody ever thinks it should be taxed more. I wonder why?Not only that, two days ago I had a 9km drive along a washed-out farm track, with over half a meter of water in some places and ruts which would ground out most other vehicles, and I did it in serene luxury in a car also capable of 130+mph. For a one-car solution, there are no better alternatives.But I do concede that most large SUV owners rarely use them as intended, although with some modern (particularly the Germans) SUVs, perhaps they are using them as intended, as off-road ability seems to be a secondary consideration (if it even is at all).Bit of a lazy, defensive assumption to throw around terms like "green eyed monster" when this has nothing to do with jealousy.These are only "one-car solutions" if you need to go off road. If not, sacrificing centre of gravity and weight rules them out of being a one-car solution. A Civic Type R is a one-car solution. Maybe a spicy 3 Series for those that way inclined. Not a 2.5 tonne lump on stilts.If you start to remove use cases then they are no longer 'one car solutions'. If I only ever drive on track then a Radical is the perfect one-car solution. See the problem?It's not just off-road, it is the combination of off-road ability, luggage space, internal comfort, excellent NVH, etc. None of which your CTR has for example.People tie themselves in knots to defend their position - because they don't need one, then nobody should have one. But the reality is it is simp
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.