BMW
엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

BMW 7시리즈 수리 사례

2028년식 · G70S (2022-현재) · 740i 자동

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 10. 18. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 쉬움⏱ 예상 30~60분🔧 잭스탠드

증상

The tanks needed for cold gas thrusters that can do what was done in the demo will be as large as the cars interior. For any kind of distance or practicality, this will not happen. It's a ketamine induced fantasy designed to milk more money out of the shareholders.

처리 내용

2xChevrons said: pycraft said: By the way, can we agree that, rather than a flying car, he has in fact come up with three products that look the same; a road car (with and without a fan), a track-only drag racer, and a flying car-shaped object.I for one agree with that. As a poster pointed out in the very early pages of this thread, the demonstrated 'flying car [shaped object]' is no more a flying car than that remote controlled blimp shaped like a Vauxhall Astra that flew around the Top Gear studio over 20 years ago. The 'flying' Roadster is about as real as a stunt car in a James Bond film. It may have actually happened in that particular shot, but it's not an actual Aston Martin with machine guns in the wings, a BMW 7-Series with a cable-cutter in the bonnet badge or a Lotus Elise that can become a submarine. It's the result of a lot of clever design and engineering to make the stunt happen and give the appearance of what was required, and it's a cool sequence to watch. But it doesn't actually exist as a functional product. Edited by 2xChevrons on Saturday 17th October 16:42 Do people think it’s real though? Or do people realise it’s a stunt to publicise a car [shape] that will quite likely be for sale. I’d imagine 99% of people don’t actually think you’ll be able to buy a flying car in 2028. I’d like to bet that a lot of concept cars are not actually useable as a car.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 엔진오일 교환 사례