엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

포르쉐 카이엔 수리 사례

2026년식 · 9YA (2017-현재) · 3.0 V6

2026. 10. 27. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

AB said: It is just another one though isn t it.It does feel like we're being overrun now as you say, and electric cars just seem like a copy and paste of each other now really I think.

처리 내용

Twinair said: GT9 said: Twinair said: I was generally OK - with it also But if you look into the updated law as of June - there has been the inclusion of - feelings - into the seizure powersNo actual evidence is needed - now - at allSo yeah - let s say you leave a car meet - give it a big boot - pops bangs - crackles sideways - big slewy and applause from the YouTube uploaders - or some local scrote with a massively wrong pops and bangs map - this to me was always fair gameHowever, there is no need to have any actual evidence by the awaiting and seizing officer - at all - it can be as simple as: I have formed the opinion that your driving was likely to cause offence & that due care and attention has been misled on your partIt can be as simple as granny Miggens on the edge of town has called your car and driving in - the seizure can take place when the police have time - ie at some nominal time laterHave a look at the serious car and bike enthusiasts on instagram - with there live footage - having the chat on the side of the roadThis is not and ICE - EV battlement - this is carte Blanche powers to seize the vehicle based on police feelings and opinionMatt Armstrong hoons his latest crash fix up - self incriminating I m afraid - no need for actual evidence from anywhereI was shocked when I researched it a bitPassing a slower car at say 40mph in a sunny B road - zip the Porsche up to 60 leptons in second gear - that s enough for the feeling to be triggeredYou and anyone else - in my view - should definitely NOT be OK with this new law There is no appeal process either - other than a very costly self funded - solicitor led proceeding It s not a good sign or development from the previous section 59 It's not an automatic conviction or points is it?That would have to be a separate event following the usual process.If it's just a seizure of the vehicle and you have it back a few days later, why would a solicitor be involved?I think maybe my point is not coming across -