총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 9. 15. 작업
Opapayer said: Clad-Hach said: Apparently if NATO went in to Ukraine it would be all over in two weeks, Russia forced back to their border, Russia does not have the air capability that NATO has.They would get destroyed from the air and they could do nothing about it.NATO is a defensive organisation. It is there to protect members if one is attacked then all are considered to be being attacked and act accordingly. It is not an offensive organisation, despite what Putin says. It won t attack Russia unless Russia attacks it first. I think if that happened, paying a bit more for our petrol will
MiniMan64 said: Square Leg said: Opapayer said: Clad-Hach said: Apparently if NATO went in to Ukraine it would be all over in two weeks, Russia forced back to their border, Russia does not have the air capability that NATO has.They would get destroyed from the air and they could do nothing about it.NATO is a defensive organisation. It is there to protect members if one is attacked then all are considered to be being attacked and act accordingly. It is not an offensive organisation, despite what Putin says. It won t attack Russia unless Russia attacks it first. I think if that happened, paying a bit more for our petrol will be the least of our worries Yes, I suspect if Europe got seriously involved, in an offensive way, then Putin falls back on the big red button and we re all fked. Although there s an interesting (not fun) conversation around if the West would actually use the big button themselves, even if Russia did first. I don't agree with that...Russia have been shown up on the battlefield to be unorganized, poorly trained and don't have the vast reserves of up to date weapons the West was lead to believe, the spin that they are keeping the "good stuff" in reserve is just that, it doesn't exist.As for the nuclear button...Putin knows the consequences if he did this, it won't ever happen, and who's to say they will even work when you see the state of the rest of their gear.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.