총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 3. 작업
What a grotesque blob. A shame. Rather have a David Brown tractor...more class and easier to park ;-)Also - SUVs are supposedly profit drivers. Yet Aston Martin loses money constantly. Another reason it's a waste of space.
PCaluta said: ou might not recommend an Urus to someone in the market but I certainly would over a DBX. As I predicted, there'd be people on here bringing their anecdotal stories but the facts regarding market preference for these cars really can't be disputed.Since 2018, Urus has had seven recalls, the majority of which were non-mechanical, involving minor component bugs or software anomalies. Its largest recall impacted over 10,000 cars but was just a parking assist software update to fix a backup camera display glitch. Its only real mechanical issues were a hood latch striker plate that could separate at extreme high speeds (above 94 mph) on a small batch of Performante models, and loose fuel line quick-connectors early in production.Since 2020, DBX has had eight recalls (the first coming a few months after initially going on sale) involving critical mechanical faults that could directly cause catastrophic hardware failure. Its most severe recall involved nearly 4,000 cars because of faulty rear suspension torque reaction links that could slide out and cause the lower suspension arm to crack or shear entirely while driving. Other DBX recalls involved sub-standard oil cooler hoses that split and seized the engine and incorrectly assembled fuse boxes that presented serious fire risks. Considering that's nearly a third of all DBX built globally affected by a major structural suspension defects, I know where I'd be putting my money!Having sold less than 14,000 units worldwide, DBX does not have traditional reliability scores from mainstream outlets like J.D. Power, Consumer Reports, or the What Car? Reliability Survey, therefore we can really only take clues from this specific market segments residual values which are primarily dictated by a marques reliability; after three years, an Urus depreciates roughly 14.8% vs DBX's roughly 27.3%. After five years, that same Urus has lost roughly 34.1% vs 49.3% for DBX.Having sold almost 42,000 cars worldwide, there are nearl
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.