총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 9. 22. 작업
donkmeister said: Maintainability is a tricky one. The obvious metric would be "cost to maintain", and then you very quickly fall into trading off cost of parts Vs labour to fit parts, and the MTBF of said parts becomes part of the equation too.As a car enthusiast you might be happy to spend a few hours a few times a year keeping your car in fine fettle, but the Tard on the Clapham Jaecoo bus would simply take it to a garage and shout "CAR NO GO. FIX UM CAR." At which point the service manager loads up the parts cannon, because it's cheaper to pay a technician to replace subassemblies than it
Opapayer said: donkmeister said: Maintainability is a tricky one. The obvious metric would be "cost to maintain", and then you very quickly fall into trading off cost of parts Vs labour to fit parts, and the MTBF of said parts becomes part of the equation too.As a car enthusiast you might be happy to spend a few hours a few times a year keeping your car in fine fettle, but the Tard on the Clapham Jaecoo bus would simply take it to a garage and shout "CAR NO GO. FIX UM CAR." At which point the service manager loads up the parts cannon, because it's cheaper to pay a technician to replace subassemblies than it is to hire a mechanic and pay them to do mechanicking. Also said Tard doesn't care if the car is maintainable on 3 years and 1 day, because he'll be on the next piece of crap then.I hand my car over to the professionals rather than risking ballsing it up myself. I know where my skillset is and I also know I can earn more in the time it takes for them to do it than it costs me letting the experts do it. YMMV, but try not to judge everyone by your position. I m happy to be mechanically incompetent and am not in the slightest bit embarrassed by it. How ignorant I already said most people wouldn't get their hands dirty, after all this is a car enthusiasts website so already you've shifted the bar from "people who view a car as an appliance" to "a thing that people want to physically involve themselves with". Your typical Jaecoo-leasing person will be quite happy to never see under the covers, but for PHers that's generally untrue.
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗BMW 5시리즈
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
포르쉐 카이엔
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
차량 정보 없음
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
포르쉐 카이엔
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.