총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 30. 작업
Sway said: "so having reverse engineered the 986 2.5 CANBus earlier (which isn't mean to exist)"The casualness of this sentence utterly blows my feeble brain.To be fair there's only two messages on it and getting access to it involves shoving two missing pins in the ECU connector so its not really that big a deal . Fun fact it's the same CAN messages as on a 996 Cup Car - guess Bosch/Porsche just reused the series production ECU for that one Sway said: The quality of the rest of the build turns what's left into jelly.Absolutely adore this! There's a few bits which will evolve/get better (it
poppopbangbang said: Project Bugster Concept:Sensible people would leave it at that, sensible people definitely wouldn't even contemplate a Boxster based RAID buggy, sensible people would know that you couldn't possible build a competitive off road competition vehicle from a hairdressers car, sensible people wouldn't have two other Porsche based projects on the go.....Anyway I bought this last week: An awesomely base spec 2.5L 1998 Boxster with a depressingly grey interior and a proper poverty spec with the exception of having climate control.Clean isn't it.... that's because it's done less than 45K miles. I had said I'd only build this if I could fine a mint monocoque to do it with that was ripe for Rothmans livery - three days later this popped up. So basically it was fate. The astute amongst you will note the major problem with the concept is that the rads on a 986/996 are in the corners of the bumpers so there's no way to build that actual concept because you'd never get the corners clear to allow for that amount of front wheel clearance/exposure...So anyway here's the concept for frunk mounted rads on a 986:The front of the boot will be removed to create an inlet air duct with the original rear rad ducts / fan carriers used to seal the backs of the rads to chimney out the bonnet in the low pressure area in the middle third of the bonnet skin. There are a few challenges with this, the rad duct intake is going to be pretty small but its workable. The diffuser ramp angle in the feed side of the rad box is compromised by the rad position but by splitting the duct in two and with some pragmatism this becomes workable as two seperate rad ducts. The rad exits I can get to about 1.3X the rad core and into a low pressure zone so this really helps extraction. Bottom line is I can cool 150KW at 100KPH and that's all I need for a 2.5L M96! Still a bit of work to do around this but the math does actually math so we're off to a good start! Intrax are already in to do damper
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗차량 정보 없음
1995 TVR Griffith 500 (N reg) - Giallo Fly/Navy interior, non-PAS/non-aircon. 배지는 500 HC (모든 5.0은 highlift cam 사양). 엔진 상태 점검을 위해 rolling road 세션 예약함.
포르쉐 카이엔
Writing the title made me wonder how many rear engined coupes have existed. I got 911 (obviously), some Alpines, Delorean, Fiat / Abarth versions of the 850. There must be more.But this is none of those. Its Japanese, made in the '80s and sold here in reasonable numbers. But they are now firmly in the category of 'rare but nobody gives a st'. And only a handful remain. It's a car I've had a yearning to own and got outbid on one at auction many years ago. More recently I contacted a seller on FB, we agreed a price and then he blocked me...So I broke the first rule of car buying and bought one s
아우디 A4
2015 Audi S4 (3.0 V6 슈퍼차저) Avant Black Edition 장기 보유 차량. 병원에서 신생아 운반, 스코틀랜드와 프랑스 등지로 장거리 주행.
차량 정보 없음
I'm debating what I do with a speedo conversion. Plus point with the Lockwood is you get mph and kph whereas converting it on the CAN leaves you with mph only. Or I could just leave it in Km. I'm fairly used to doing it in my head that way around. Of course, there was an incident in the Forester where I forgot it was converted and I took it up to an indicated 100 thinking 'this feels strangely fast'