엔진오일 교환PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

포르쉐 카이엔 수리 사례

9YA (2017-현재) · 3.0 V6

2026. 10. 12. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

SpeckledJim said: dinkel said: otolith said: SpeckledJim said: They do indeed. And they'd do a great job of being completely steamrollered by Porsche. Change was and is needed."insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results"Change in any market is about babysteps. Well, at least when you have a vast community, and folks are expecting about the same thing, but then different.Yeah, I remember when I got my iPhone 1. It was basically 90% like my Nokia 3210. Except completely different. They should have made it more like an old Nokia and maybe then it would have

처리 내용

Debaser said: R4EVS said: RacerMike said: R4EVS said: Stick Legs said: I watched Harry Metcalfe's video on it.My new Jaguar timeline goes like this:Initial Type 00 advert - Hate it.See it in the metal at Goodwood FoS - Okay I get it but it won't look like that in production or cost £130k...Launch of Type 01 - The mad barstards have actually done it! Love it!Harry's walk around - WTaF?The space between the interior and exterior is insane. The door apertures are tiny in comparison to the doors, like Gloveboxes have been for years.It's almost as if they used a Jaguar X351 XJ shell and skinned it in the......Oh my god they haven't......have they?Could they?<snip>There was a reputed X351 EV prototype, I mean I know Jaguar are strapped for cash but...I like the inside & the outside, it's the transition between them that is complete garbage, and there is so much wasted body volume.This makes it look like someone has tried very hard to recycle an Ice platform into a new EV.The penny is starting to drop! I cited in a previous Type 01 thread (when the camouflaged version was getting limited test runs) that it looked like a reskin of the aborted (yet production-ready) EV XJ replacement, pointing to the fact that the original car's curved windscreen line and door apertures could still be spotted behind the glass and moreso with the doors open, despite the exterior flat roof and sharp-angled A-pillar.I was accused at the time of talking rubbish, but it is getting harder to deny now that everyone is getting a closer look.Having worked on and driven that very car in your photo, you're talking rubbish. The electrical architecture is totally different, and the underpinnings on the X391 were based on the Range Rover MLA platform. The Type 01 has as much in common with that car as it does with an F-Type, and 391 would have been an abject failure. 2/3 of the driving range of Type 01 with half the charging speed, looking like a blow up version of an XF and half the power.And the