์ด ๋น์ฉ
-
๊ณต์
-
๋ถํ๋น
-
์์ ์๊ฐ
-
2026. 10. 22. ์์
Those seats need some serious attention, the vinyl roof needs attention and the bumpers need attention.And the shut lines are all over the place.Still cool as fk though.
J4CKO said: mjspencer348 said: J4CKO said: Was the eighties, everything ended up with a GTi version, because marketing.I had a Montego GTi, you could buy a Nissan Cherry GTi and there was the Peugeot 505 GTi, probably other examples of inappropriate GTi badging out there as well.Not saying those werent decent enough cars, more about the incongruous, inappropriate and cynical GTi badging. 1990 Rover Metro GTI, the best 0-60 time Autocar could manage was 9.8sec...Small hatch with a revvy 16 valve engine, the very definition of a hot hatch !They were good, the 0 to 60 time seems off for 105 bhp in not much weight but let s put that down to gearing.They were quite quick and fairly well thought of at the time by road testers.I had one, but it was well past its best, I tried to kill it but the little fker just got faster, used to go everywhere flat out, actively tryingto break it but was the only person not to kill a k series, maybe that was the secret ? Treat them mean keep it keen ?But it was every inch a hot hatch, a Golf GTI of the time wouldn t keep up, they were superb handlers if the radius arms weren t shot, when they were they were like a broken shopping trolley.Try one with a VVC transplanted in !Hand your PH membership card in, J4CKO! How dare you let actual ownership experience get in the way of prejudiced opinion!
์ถ์ฒ
์ด ์ฌ๋ก๋ PistonHeads์์ ์์งํ ๋ฐ์ดํฐ์ ๋๋ค.
์ ๋ขฐ๋ 4.1์ (๋์) โ ์ถ์ฒ ์์ค์ ์ ๋ฌธ์ฑ/๊ฒ์ฆ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ์ฐ์ ๋ ์ ์์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ ํ์ฑ์ ๋ณด์ฅํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค.
์๋ฌธ ๋ณด๊ธฐ โBMW 5์๋ฆฌ์ฆ
In a multi story that I was using earlier this evening, the MOT ran out in May 24. I do find the car park ones odd, I've seen other seemingly abandoned cars in other car parks, I'd love to know the reasons.
ํฌ๋ฅด์ ์นด์ด์
A somewhat unbalanced duo which is acknowledged from the start in this head to head. I would never put these two on the same page and i found myself unpicking the Porsche rather than comparing it to the Morgan. Despite the indifferences the 911 wins out.
์ฐจ๋ ์ ๋ณด ์์
I got the make and basic model in three - not Cardle's answer though. Ironically I intended to type in Challenger but ended up typing Charger for some reason - so I got it right by default!
ํฌ๋ฅด์ ์นด์ด์
If its styling fuses a little 6GT with a little 720S, I can't see it going far wrong.Building an SUV is a sad but perhaps necessary evil. Performance manufacturers should really look at a different set of priorities to luxury marques. A McLaren, Ferrari, Lambo, Porsche, or even Bentley SUV should be something that could conceivably win a race. Make the body low and wide, and if it has to be jacked up, make it jacked up for sand dunes and mud pits, not Kensington kerbs and speedbumps. Most importantly, make it weigh less! Else there's no S about it, it's just a big fat squishy UV.