1998년식 · B5 (1994-2001) · 1.8T
총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 10. 27. 작업
Project Bugster Concept:Sensible people would leave it at that, sensible people definitely wouldn't even contemplate a Boxster based RAID buggy, sensible people would know that you couldn't possible build a competitive off road competition vehicle from a hairdressers car, sensible people wouldn't have two other Porsche based projects on the go.....Anyway I bought this last week: An awesomely base spec 2.5L 1998 Boxster with a depressingly grey interior and a proper poverty spec with the exception of having climate control.Clean isn't it.... that's because it's done less than 45K miles. I had s
One of the potentially more challenging aspects of this build is going to be camber, or rather how to put a load more height into a vehicle that's designed to be very much at one static height and is on mcpherson struts on the front. The nature of a strut type suspension is that it has camber change during its motion, in the case of the Boxster it gains negative camber in compression and looses it in extension. What this means is that if you extend the suspension, for example by increasing the length of the damper you end up with a load of positive camber.... something which is not good or useful in any way. To solve this we can do two things, either move the upper pickup point i.e the top mount which in turn moves the angle of the wheel or extend the lower wishbone length which again moves the angle of the wheel. Eurowise actually make a lift kit for the 986 which extends the damper by adding a section between the top mount and chassis and in turn moves the effective pickup point:This is fine for circa 50mm of ride height increase but above this stuff starts to clash as you need more offset to compensate for the height. You also don't get any more travel. Hence I need a better way to do it.... with a longer bottom arm. This means I can also keep the ball joint angle under control i.e. I can position it so the deflection is biased where I need most travel. So basically I need longer arms. No one makes a longer bottom arm for a 986 but Porsche (and a few copy cats) do make shim adjustable arms for the GT2/GT3: Which use a seperate inner bush carrier which is then shimmed off the main component to provide camber adjustment:So the plan is to use the main component as is and then draw up and manufacture a new inner bush carrier which has circa 20mm more material on it before the studs. This will take a poly bush to allow for greater range of movement vs bonded rubber and the additional length means it will increase the effective length of the wishbone whilst still allow
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗2015 아우디 S4 Avant(3.0 V6 슈퍼차저)의 장기 소유 차량 관리 및 성능 업그레이드에 대한 문의. 차량은 신차 구매 후 가족 용도로 장기간 사용 중이며, 리맵핑을 통한 성능 향상 가능성 검토 중.
2015 아우디 S4 (3.0 V6 슈퍼차저) Avant Black Edition - 장기 소유 차량, 가족 차량으로 사용 중. 신차 구매 후 어린 자녀들 병원 이송, 스코틀랜드, 프랑스 등 장거리 여행 사용.
2015 Audi S4 (3.0 V6 슈퍼차저) Avant Black Edition 장기 보유 차량. 병원에서 신생아 운반, 스코틀랜드와 프랑스 등지로 장거리 주행.
2015 아우디 S4 어반트(3.0 V6 슈퍼차저)의 장기 보유 차량 점검 및 성능 개선 검토
차량 정보 없음
1995 TVR Griffith 500 (N reg) - Giallo Fly/Navy interior, non-PAS/non-aircon. 배지는 500 HC (모든 5.0은 highlift cam 사양). 엔진 상태 점검을 위해 rolling road 세션 예약함.
포르쉐 카이엔
Writing the title made me wonder how many rear engined coupes have existed. I got 911 (obviously), some Alpines, Delorean, Fiat / Abarth versions of the 850. There must be more.But this is none of those. Its Japanese, made in the '80s and sold here in reasonable numbers. But they are now firmly in the category of 'rare but nobody gives a st'. And only a handful remain. It's a car I've had a yearning to own and got outbid on one at auction many years ago. More recently I contacted a seller on FB, we agreed a price and then he blocked me...So I broke the first rule of car buying and bought one s
아우디 A4
2015 Audi S4 (3.0 V6 슈퍼차저) Avant Black Edition 장기 보유 차량. 병원에서 신생아 운반, 스코틀랜드와 프랑스 등지로 장거리 주행.
차량 정보 없음
I'm debating what I do with a speedo conversion. Plus point with the Lockwood is you get mph and kph whereas converting it on the CAN leaves you with mph only. Or I could just leave it in Km. I'm fairly used to doing it in my head that way around. Of course, there was an incident in the Forester where I forgot it was converted and I took it up to an indicated 100 thinking 'this feels strangely fast'