볼보
사고 차량 점검PistonHeads★ 신뢰도 4.1 (높음)

볼보 XC40 수리 사례

X (2017-현재) · Recharge Twin AWD P8

총 비용

-

공임

-

부품비

-

소요 시간

-

2026. 7. 26. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

난이도 보통⏱ 예상 60~180🔧 전용 진단기

증상

Volvo makes safe cars which are not only the bare minimum in passing NCAP but offer real safety.For example crashing into a stopped lorry at 40mph I am sure there will be no intrusion into the Volvo cabin. Which other crossover will be the same? Sure they all will pass a standardised test but cruising into a lorry that is stopped or suddenly stops or a full sized SUV crashing into the crossover at 50mph which crossover will be closest to the Volvo in safety. Like for example the Chr and Lexus UX are similar in size but not sure if their A pillars and B pillars are as strong? Should overall veh

처리 내용

raspberry-26 said: Volvo makes safe cars which are not only the bare minimum in passing NCAP but offer real safety.For example crashing into a stopped lorry at 40mph I am sure there will be no intrusion into the Volvo cabin. Which other crossover will be the same? Sure they all will pass a standardised test but cruising into a lorry that is stopped or suddenly stops or a full sized SUV crashing into the crossover at 50mph which crossover will be closest to the Volvo in safety. Like for example the Chr and Lexus UX are similar in size but not sure if their A pillars and B pillars are as strong? Should overall vehicle weight be a factor? Your assuming the Volvo is the Gold standard. I have no idea like any one else if that is true or not. NCAP is the rating system and by and large reliable. I also look at the Moose test which tests steering in an emergency. I never crashed a car other than a small bumps in 40 years, but I have has to steering during an emergency. This is what got me interested in the moose test as one Citroen estate company car was a total nightmare in this situation.

출처

이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.

신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.

원문 보기 ↗

다른 차종의 사고 차량 점검 사례

차량 정보 없음

Many moons ago I owned a 156 SW V6 that I bought by accident but really should not have sold. 156 V6 It was a car that absolutely adored the noise and looks but that I never really trusted for main family car duties. It also seemed to be a magnet for other people to drive into. It was replaced by a surprisingly brilliant Octavia VRS which lacked the drama of the 156 but has been absolutely faultless for 6 years, massive inside, still relatively rapid and actually pretty good to look at too to my eye. The main problem with the Skoda is that s just a bit too good at what it does (a VRS Estat

차량 정보 없음

Many moons ago I owned a 156 SW V6 that I bought by accident but really should not have sold. 156 V6 It was a car that absolutely adored the noise and looks but that I never really trusted for main family car duties. It also seemed to be a magnet for other people to drive into. It was replaced by a surprisingly brilliant Octavia VRS which lacked the drama of the 156 but has been absolutely faultless for 6 years, massive inside, still relatively rapid and actually pretty good to look at too to my eye. The main problem with the Skoda is that s just a bit too good at what it does (a VRS Estat

차량 정보 없음

사고 발생 시 연료 운반이 심각한 위험을 초래하는가?

차량 정보 없음

The one thing embedded in my head from over forty years of motorcycling is always leave room for you to make that unexpected avoidance maneuver...or be killed, you build a kind of sixth sense observing what traffic does, its hard to explain but its there.I used to commute by bike on one of the most dangerous roads I've ever come across...the Edinburgh city by-pass, to say the standard of driving was horrendous would be an understatement, I kid you not there was a crash every other day, sometimes every day.Those bike skills of observation has served me very well over the years driving cars...I