타이어 교환 수리 사례

2026. 10. 24. 작업

난이도 & 준비물

증상

brillomaster said: Oh thats another thing, because theyre ginormous and powerful, they need massive brakes, and massive tyres. Whereas if a car was only one of those things, it wouldn't.Its just, youve walked into a dealership, and just asked for the most expensive car. Not the best car, just the most expensive.You've gone 'what's the most expensive car youve got? Expensive to buy, expensive to fuel, expensive to maintain and expensive to repair... if any part of the car is considered cheap or 'a sensible purchase' im out. I want to show i have so much money that at every decision point, i to

처리 내용

Orangutangerine said: WH16 said: brillomaster said: Strong nope to all of these, completely unnecessary on today's roads. Furthermore, id be fine with anyone who does drive one of these gassing guzzling behemoths having to pay £5000 a year, every year, for the privilege. There is something about SUVs which always brings out the green eyed monster. It is strange as my OH's car (not an SUV) is almost exactly the same footprint as my FFRR, and weighs more, and is less fuel efficient, but nobody ever thinks it should be taxed more. I wonder why?Not only that, two days ago I had a 9km drive along a washed-out farm track, with over half a meter of water in some places and ruts which would ground out most other vehicles, and I did it in serene luxury in a car also capable of 130+mph. For a one-car solution, there are no better alternatives.But I do concede that most large SUV owners rarely use them as intended, although with some modern (particularly the Germans) SUVs, perhaps they are using them as intended, as off-road ability seems to be a secondary consideration (if it even is at all).Bit of a lazy, defensive assumption to throw around terms like "green eyed monster" when this has nothing to do with jealousy.These are only "one-car solutions" if you need to go off road. If not, sacrificing centre of gravity and weight rules them out of being a one-car solution. A Civic Type R is a one-car solution. Maybe a spicy 3 Series for those that way inclined. Not a 2.5 tonne lump on stilts.If you start to remove use cases then they are no longer 'one car solutions'. If I only ever drive on track then a Radical is the perfect one-car solution. See the problem?It's not just off-road, it is the combination of off-road ability, luggage space, internal comfort, excellent NVH, etc. None of which your CTR has for example.People tie themselves in knots to defend their position - because they don't need one, then nobody should have one. But the reality is it is simple envy (not