총 비용
-
공임
-
부품비
-
소요 시간
-
2026. 8. 7. 작업
You need the talent of a racing driver to drive vehicles this powerful to within anything like their capabilities.And you need a track to do it on.So, what's the point? Answer: it's just a dick-swinging contest for the ultra-rich.If you cared about driving, you'd buy a much lighter, manual car - probably with about half the power at the most.With this, the electronics are doing so much of the driving for you. Otherwise, you'd crash.[Copy and paste hypercars = copy and paste comment.]
je777 said: You need the talent of a racing driver to drive vehicles this powerful to within anything like their capabilities.And you need a track to do it on.So, what's the point? Answer: it's just a dick-swinging contest for the ultra-rich.If you cared about driving, you'd buy a much lighter, manual car - probably with about half the power at the most.With this, the electronics are doing so much of the driving for you. Otherwise, you'd crash.[Copy and paste hypercars = copy and paste comment.]It does look very nice, though. Leather-coated racing wheel is a bit silly, but apart from that.I'm not inclined to dismiss cars with this kind of power outright until I've driven one. Like you, II reckon schlepping down the M5 in this doesn't feel that different in this than it does in a "lesser" high-end GT car even with a third of the power, assuming you have even a passing regard to speed limits. I'm not certain though, so if someone wants to chuck me the keys to one of these and say a new Conti GT to compare, you're more than welcome
출처
이 사례는 PistonHeads에서 수집한 데이터입니다.
신뢰도 4.1점(높음) — 출처 소스의 전문성/검증구조를 기준으로 산정된 점수이며, 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다.
원문 보기 ↗차량 정보 없음
Many moons ago I owned a 156 SW V6 that I bought by accident but really should not have sold. 156 V6 It was a car that absolutely adored the noise and looks but that I never really trusted for main family car duties. It also seemed to be a magnet for other people to drive into. It was replaced by a surprisingly brilliant Octavia VRS which lacked the drama of the 156 but has been absolutely faultless for 6 years, massive inside, still relatively rapid and actually pretty good to look at too to my eye. The main problem with the Skoda is that s just a bit too good at what it does (a VRS Estat
차량 정보 없음
Many moons ago I owned a 156 SW V6 that I bought by accident but really should not have sold. 156 V6 It was a car that absolutely adored the noise and looks but that I never really trusted for main family car duties. It also seemed to be a magnet for other people to drive into. It was replaced by a surprisingly brilliant Octavia VRS which lacked the drama of the 156 but has been absolutely faultless for 6 years, massive inside, still relatively rapid and actually pretty good to look at too to my eye. The main problem with the Skoda is that s just a bit too good at what it does (a VRS Estat
차량 정보 없음
사고 발생 시 연료 운반이 심각한 위험을 초래하는가?
차량 정보 없음
The one thing embedded in my head from over forty years of motorcycling is always leave room for you to make that unexpected avoidance maneuver...or be killed, you build a kind of sixth sense observing what traffic does, its hard to explain but its there.I used to commute by bike on one of the most dangerous roads I've ever come across...the Edinburgh city by-pass, to say the standard of driving was horrendous would be an understatement, I kid you not there was a crash every other day, sometimes every day.Those bike skills of observation has served me very well over the years driving cars...I